Labeotropheus aurantinfra

You can sponsor this page

Labeotropheus aurantinfra Phiri & Pauers, 2023

アップロード 写真 そして ビデオ
グーグルの画像
Image of Labeotropheus aurantinfra
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Cichlidae.

分類 / 名前 共通名の | 類義語 | Catalog of Fishes(部類, ) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Cichliformes (Cichlids, convict blennies) > Cichlidae (Cichlids) > Pseudocrenilabrinae
Etymology: Labeotropheus: Latin, labeo = one who has large lips + Greek, tropaion = defeat, a memorial of a fighting war, trophy; because of their specialized teeth were such an obvious feeding adaptation (Ref. 45335)aurantinfra: The specific epithet is a composite of the Latin adjective aurantiacum, meaning orange coloured, and a second Latin adjective infra, meaning below or underneath; this is in reference to the unique male nuptial colour pattern, in which the ventrum, anterior abdomen, and branchiostegals feature orange colouration (Ref. 128773).

環境:環境 / 気候帯 / 深さの範囲 / 分布範囲 生態学

; 新鮮な水 底生の漂泳性. Tropical

分布 領土 | 国連食糧農業機関の区域 | エコシステム | 事件 | 目的のマップ | 導入 | Faunafri

Africa: Malawi.

サイズ / 重さ / 年齢

成熟: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 11.5 cm SL オス/雌雄の選別がない; (Ref. 128773)

簡単な記述 検索表 | 形態学 | 形態計測学

背面の脊椎 (合計) : 17 - 19; 背鰭 (合計) : 7 - 10; 肛門の骨: 3; 臀鰭: 7 - 9. Diagnosis: Labeotropheus aurantinfra differs from all other Labeotropheus due to the extensive distribution of orange pigmentation throughout the body, including the maxilla, the preopercular margin, the branchiostegals, the gular and anterior abdomen region, and the flanks; although orange pigmentation is more common and more extensive in males, it is also present in the same body regions in females (Ref. 128773). It differs from the slender-bodied Labeotropheus, L. trewavasae, L. simoneae, L. chirangali, but not L. rubidorsalis, due to its greater body depth, 33.8-41.5% of standard length vs. 26.3-33.4% in L. trewavasae, 26.9-30.8% in L. simoneae and 26.6-33.2% in L. chirangali; while L. aurantinfra does have a deeper body than L. rubidorsalis, the ranges overlap, 33.8-41.5% of standard length vs. 31.6-36.1%; Labeotropheus aurantinfra has a greater distance between the origin of the dorsal fin and the attachment of the pelvic fins, 33.4-40.4% of standard length vs. 31.5-35.4%, a shorter lower jaw, 22.5-31.6% of head length vs. 29.9-38.5%, more rows of teeth in the upper jaw, 4-6 vs. 3-4, and a greater total number of gillrakers, 10-15 vs. 9-11, than L. rubidorsalis (Ref. 128773). The primary distinction between L. aurantinfra and the other robust-bodied Labeotropheus is the unique distribution of yellow-orange pigmentation across the body, especially in the males; the morphometric and meristic values largely overlap with the other robust Labeotropheus, although there are some distinctions; Labeotropheus aurantinfra has a typically greater distance between the tip of the snout and the origin of the dorsal fin than L. fuelleborni, 31.8-37.4% of standard length vs. 30.7-33.8%, a typically greater distance between the origin of the dorsal fin and the insertion of the anal fin than L. fuelleborni, 60.8-69.5% of standard length vs. 55.1-64.9%, and typically more anal-fin rays than L. fuelleborni, 7-9 vs. 6-7; compared to L. chlorosiglos, L. aurantinfra has a greater eye diameter, 23.5-32.4% of head length vs. 22.6-25.5%, a longer rostral length, 36.1-51.1% of head length vs. 34.7-41.1%, a greater pectoral width, 13.2-18.9% of standard length vs. 12.7-14.3%, and a greater number of scale rows between the pectoral and pelvic fins, 9-12 vs. 6-9; it differs from L. artatorostris due to its greater rostral length, 36.1-51.1% of head length vs. 22.9-43.7%, a larger snout pad, 10.5-19.4% of head length vs. 7.4-16.1%, and more infraorbital neuromasts, 25-40 vs. 12-36; it differs from L. obscurus due to a typically shorter lower jaw, 22.5-31.6% of head length vs. 27.6-40.4%, a greater number of rows of teeth in the upper jaw, 4-6 vs. 3-4, and a greater number of teeth in the left half of the lower jaw, 24-37 vs. 20-26; it differs from L. candipygia due to a greater distance between the origin of the dorsal fin and the insertion of the anal fin, 60.7-69.6% of standard length vs. 50.6-66.8%, and a greater head depth, 86.0-116.6% of head length vs. 87.9-108.1% (Ref. 128773).


生物学     用語集 (例 epibenthic)

ライフサイクルと交尾行動 成熟 | 繁殖 | 放精 | | 生産力 | 幼生

主な参考文献 参考文献のアップロード | 参考文献 | コーディネーター : Kullander, Sven O. | 協力者

Pauers, M.J. and T.B. Phiri, 2023. Six new species of Labeotropheus (Cichliformes: Cichlidae) from the Malawian shore of Lake Malawi, Africa. Ichthyology & Herpetology 111(2):264-292. (Ref. 128773)

IUCNのレッドリストの状況は (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

人間に対する脅威

  Harmless





人間の用途

水産業: 興味がない
FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

より多くの情報

養殖生態
食料品(獲物)
餌の構成
摂食量
食料配給
捕食動物
生態学
生態学
人口動態
成長のパラメーター
最大年齢/サイズ
長さ-重量比。
長短関係。
体長組成
質量変換
補充
豊度
ライフサイクル
繁殖
成熟
成熟度/エラ
生産力
放精
産卵群

卵の開発
幼生
幼生の動力
分布
領土
国連食糧農業機関の区域
エコシステム
事件
導入
BRUVS - ビデオ
解剖学
カマ

オトリス
生理学
体組成
栄養素
酸素消費
水泳タイプ
泳ぐ速さ
視覚色素
フィッシュ・サウンド
病気と寄生虫
毒性(LC50)
遺伝子の
ゲノム
遺伝子の
ヘテロ接合性
遺伝
遺伝的多様性
人間関係
養殖システム
水産養殖の紹介
緊張
シガテラ症例
切手、コイン、その他
アウトリーチ
協力者
分類学
共通名の
類義語
形態学
形態計測学
画像
参考文献
参考文献

用具

特記事項

XMLをダウンロードして下さい

インターネットの情報源

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: 部類, | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | 生命の木 | Wikipedia: 行く, 検索する | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | 動物に関する記録

モデルに基づく推定値

系統多様性指数 (参照 82804):  PD50 = 0.5005   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight: a=0.01445 (0.00671 - 0.03113), b=2.99 (2.82 - 3.16), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
栄養段階 (参照 69278):  3.4   ±0.4 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
回復力 (参照 120179):  高い, 15か月以下の倍増期間の最小個体群 (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
漁業の脆弱性 (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (10 of 100). 🛈